|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
670
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 22:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
It's fun kids, but I would like to present this friendly public service announcement... you are getting close to over doing it. What is my reasoning you ask so politely? A month of Hulkageddon following a burn Jita event may be full of lulz, but it is starting to catch on everywhere. CCP is taking notice, and when CCP takes notice they can easily decide to notice that a certain mechanic/tactic/shipclass is being used to often, and to too great effect. Whether you agree with them or not.
I would prefer if Hulkageddon stays around, just like I would prefer to be flying a Nano'd HAC right now that defies all weapon tracking. But alas, I fear that by the end of this month all of the delicious tears that you crave will force the issue to be addressed by CCP in the following months.
You made CCP look at and nerf the boomerang. You made them notice that abandoning your drones was a bannable offense.
Yes... all obvious exploits, but as you troll this thread, just remember one thing, they were easy to look past until they were used in excess.
As these events progress and come into their own, it is all to easy to take it somewhere that could have unintended results for you. I don't know what the future holds, but I do know one thing... when CCP notices something big in game... we all tend to suffer a little bit from the backlash. It's on the news, it's on the forums and it is central to the highly publicized thingy that shall go unnamed. All of you have managed to troll and lol'd suicide ganking into the limelight like never before, and if history can be our teacher, to make an obvious meme, this is probably going to end badly. Or at the very least, not the way all of you want it to.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
670
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 22:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
T' Elk wrote:What in the actual **** is wrong with you? Autism detected.
Ah I see... maybe you're new to eve then. * Doesn't bother to check your history.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
671
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 23:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:So what exactly are you saying? We should tone down the Jita burning and Hulkaggedon to a diet version?
TBH, sort of... yes To be frank. I know it won't happen or anything, but the reality of what is liable to transpire after this month is looming IMO.
If people keep upping the bar like this, It is more or less inevitable isn't it?
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
671
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 23:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:Sweet jesus, Captain Butthurt strikes again. Are you still harping on about all this? EDIT: I just realised why you are so butthurt over all this Eternum Praetorian wrote:You made CCP look at and nerf the boomerang. You made them notice that abandoning your drones was a bannable offense.
Yes... all obvious exploits, but as you troll this thread, just remember one thing, they were easy to look past until they were used in excess. You rely on the loopholes and flaws in the game don't you? Scams, little "tricks" that few people know about? And then when the Goons or people like them, bring these things to CCP's attention and they get removed, well that just totally messes up your "fun" doesn't it? If it weren't for them old nasty Goons, you could keep using those little known exploits and a**hole tactics in order to keep feeling superior. Well well well, poor little Captain Butthurt really is hurting now isn't he. And that is the reason for all your anti-goon sentiment. You are a sad and lonely little man, and you have my pity.
U seem mad about something? Can you be more clear?
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
671
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 02:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ah look, I have once again sparked an intelligent debate!
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
673
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 03:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
FYI, the easiest nerf to suicide ganking would have nothing to do with nerfing Alpha or boosting Hulk tanks. It would be about how concord deals with -5 sec status pilots and below. Concord could in theory prevent ships of >- 5 pilots from entering warp after boarding and/or they could immediately neut/ECM after boarding, and what are you going to do then? If they really want to **** on you they could make you grind more sec for each gank, by increasing the sec hit as well.
You people are not thinking like CCP might. They don't have to change any ship to seriously nerf ganking.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
682
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 12:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
fgft Athonille wrote:u r one one mad bad op
Stupid meme is stupid TBH, saying that an op seemed mad does not mean it had any angry connotation. I will be mad however if suicide ganking in general is nerfed into the floor. And so will you
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
682
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 12:48:00 -
[8] - Quote
Zed Jackelope wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:You made CCP look at and nerf the boomerang. You made them notice that abandoning your drones was a bannable offense.
Yes... all obvious exploits, but as you troll this thread, just remember one thing, they were easy to look past until they were used in excess. Wrong. 1. Warping away from a suicide gank was never an exploit, it was only an exploit if you successfully avoided Concord. You still could not dock, you still could not jump through a gate, you still could not jump through a wormhole. All you could do is stay in warp until they caught up to you and you were popped. 2. Abandoning your drones should never have been an exploit, because Concord should NEVER have shot at abandoned drones in the first place. Abandoned drones are trash, anyone can pick them up, and they do not attack anyone. That is an oversight on the Devs for not thinking of the obvious.
Now you seem angry. I will offer a **** you, because CCP "fixed" these usable features as a direct result of players bringing more attention to them. Kiss <3.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
691
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 20:44:00 -
[9] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:npc corp posters analyze nullsec
All the cool kids in nullsec post with NPC alts. Just saying.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
691
|
Posted - 2012.04.29 22:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
And here i was thinking that people joined EVE because of this instead
Ah... the good old days * wipes away tear.
On second thought... it's so much better to have people joining because they dream of (marketed) ripping off of alliances and ganking idiots. So much better!
|
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
692
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 03:27:00 -
[11] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote: It is better....
Then dare I say that you are an idiot kind sir. And no, I do not wish to further converse with you (nor entertain the ludicrous idea of) how EVE Never Fades HQ compares (or does not compare) to the "stealing from alliance" trailer. Reason being....they are not on the same level, galaxy or dimension of awesome.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
694
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 11:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Rants for pages
I don't think your medication is working properly anymore, just saying. Eve never fades is win because it is win, it represents the dream of eve not simply shiny. The good Null sec miners are already filthy rich, and even better.... why don't you go try an get rich in low sec for me? I would be happy to nuke my sec status again if people decided to start doing that.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
694
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 11:45:00 -
[13] - Quote
Another ridiculous statement, you are on a roll. Half of everyone here would be banned if that was even remotely true. Also, CCP seems to have banned your inappropriate signature. I guess someone at the top doesn't like what you have to say either?
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
694
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 12:10:00 -
[14] - Quote
TheBlueMonkey wrote:So people overuse\exploite ships into doing things that CCP find undesireable, so CCP ballance them and this is bad?
I find your ability to read text and miss the point entirely, while at the sometime drawing to wildly misconstrued conclusions, quite mesmerizing. Can you do it again?
* anticipates.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
694
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 12:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
Tallian Saotome, so what your saying is... someone at the top did not like what you had to say either. Cool. Can we be brosefs now? Just remember to say no homo afterward, else our manly love might be misconstrued by others.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
694
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 12:27:00 -
[16] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tallian Saotome, so what your saying is... someone at the top did not like what you had to say either. Cool. Can we be brosefs now? Just remember to say no homo afterward, else our manly love might be misconstrued by others. I sure hope you are not one of those hardbears. I'd have to call BS on the no homo in that case
I am not well vised with this new and hip term? Can you explain?
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
694
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 12:43:00 -
[17] - Quote
His post does not seem to make sense, however your post finally does.
Quote:Oh, and just FYI, CCP is reactionary, for the most part. Someone has to report something before they anything about it.
CCP is reactionary, therefore people must give them a reason to nerf something. How does one give them reason you might ask? By overuse of a ship/tactic/mechanic. Historically, how does CCP tend to react? They get over zealous with the nerfgun and we all suffer for it.
Cause and effect Mr hardbear.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
696
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 15:02:00 -
[18] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:the majority carebears are known to be a temporary, short term users, while 'hardcore' players are guaranteed money if you keep them. 'Hardcore' players are a reliable long term revenue stream, and while its not a LARGE revenue stream, its enough to keep the company afloat..
Please direct me to stats that support your assertion? I mean, we would not want people to assume that your pulling numbers out of your ass or anything.
* eagerly awaits.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
696
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 16:45:00 -
[19] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:the majority carebears are known to be a temporary, short term users, while 'hardcore' players are guaranteed money if you keep them. 'Hardcore' players are a reliable long term revenue stream, and while its not a LARGE revenue stream, its enough to keep the company afloat.. Please direct me to stats that support your assertion? I mean, we would not want people to assume that your pulling numbers out of your ass or anything. * eagerly awaits.
Pssssst.... Those stats. Still waiting.
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
697
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 16:55:00 -
[20] - Quote
You are ofc correct, and forum tears is a key venue for nerfage. I vividly remember Hardbears from all over EVE crying buckets of because of falcons.
|
|
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
698
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 22:59:00 -
[21] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:the majority carebears are known to be a temporary, short term users, while 'hardcore' players are guaranteed money if you keep them. 'Hardcore' players are a reliable long term revenue stream, and while its not a LARGE revenue stream, its enough to keep the company afloat.. Please direct me to stats that support your assertion? I mean, we would not want people to assume that your pulling numbers out of your ass or anything. * eagerly awaits.
Ok well, it has been the better part of the day... I guess Tallian Saotome really was just pulling numbers out of his ass. TBH... I suspected.
|
|
|
|